Claims reconciliation
Parse and validate 835 files, then reconcile paid, adjusted, reversal, and patient-responsibility amounts against billed charges.
RCM intelligence · provider groups
We turn claims and remittance data into a reconciled, CFO-ready diagnostic: where billed dollars went, which payers and providers drive underperformance, and what to investigate first.
The visibility gap
Provider groups run on fragmented systems. Leaders know collections are underperforming, but often cannot clearly say where the money is going, which payers or providers drive it, or what to fix first.
Start here
A paid executive engagement, not a free audit or lightweight dashboard. Arcus reconciles remittance data and delivers a clear, prioritized view of where to investigate and what to address next.
What Arcus analyzes
Parse and validate 835 files, then reconcile paid, adjusted, reversal, and patient-responsibility amounts against billed charges.
Trace billed dollars through contractual adjustments, payer denials, patient responsibility, reversals, and net collected cash.
Attribute payment outcomes without treating contractual writeoffs or patient responsibility as payer recovery opportunities.
Surface where exposure concentrates by payer, provider, procedure, location, adjustment category, and reversal behavior.
A CFO-ready narrative: what the data shows, hypotheses grounded in it, discovery questions, and prioritized next steps.
What leaders get
Where billed dollars are being lost across adjudication and collection.
The concentrations behind most of the financial exposure.
Ranked by financial materiality and actionability, not raw code volume.
What to answer before acting on each pattern.
Practical workflow fixes, vendor decisions, controls, and monitoring steps.
Carve-outs, authorization rules, COB, and medical-necessity patterns vary by payer.
Provider mix and location variation create attribution questions generic reports miss.
Provider group stacks are assembled from vendors that each see only part of the cycle.
Arcus is independent of any single RCM vendor, so recommendations follow the evidence.
Engagement model
Reconcile claims data into a CFO-ready view of payment outcomes.
Walk findings, highlight high-value areas, and frame open questions.
Review eligibility, auth, coding, denial, patient, and vendor workflows.
Prioritized fixes, vendor changes, operating controls, and monitoring steps.
Implementation support, ongoing 835 refreshes, and quarterly readouts.
Method
Arcus quantifies exposure, highlights concentrations, and surfaces hypotheses grounded in reconciled claims data. We identify patterns that warrant review, not upstream root cause from 835 data alone.
Next step
Bring a sample of your 835 files. Arcus can show how a paid diagnostic turns payment outcomes into a prioritized operating conversation.
Schedule an RCM diagnostic review